UPDATED: 04-03-26 10:21 PDT

men Coker 2
  
Coker                 
W-L: ( 6- 5) PR = 90.0135

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 130 H Barton Carolinas ( 4- 7, 90.3) 11-10 207 A Lander PBC ( 5- 7, 90.9) 11-13 212 H Emmanuel (GA) Carolinas ( 2-10, 85.3) 18- 8 214 H Chowan Carolinas ( 5- 6, 87.0) 15- 8 220 H Emory & Henry SAC ( 0- 8, 80.4) 18- 8 228 A Young Harris PBC ( 1-10, 85.1) 13-12 304 H Wingate SAC ( 8- 1, 97.5) 9-21 314 H Lincoln Memorial SAC ( 6- 4, 91.2) 15-12 318 A Newberry SAC ( 9- 2, 96.7) 8-18 321 H Anderson (SC) SAC ( 8- 2, 96.7) 15-28 328 A Tusculum SAC ( 6- 3, 90.7) 14-17 401 H Catawba SAC ( 7- 2, 94.7) 411 A Mars Hill SAC ( 1- 9, 88.0) 418 A Lenoir-Rhyne SAC ( 5- 3, 96.5)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   130 H Barton                 11-10       1     0           0.88
   207 A Lander                 11-13      -2    -1          -0.75
   212 H Emmanuel (GA)          18- 8      10     5           0.00
   214 H Chowan                 15- 8       7     3           1.59
   220 H Emory & Henry          18- 8      10    10           0.00
   228 A Young Harris           13-12       1     5    -     -3.51
   304 H Wingate                 9-21     -12    -7           0.00
   314 H Lincoln Memorial       15-12       3    -1    +      3.78
   318 A Newberry                8-18     -10    -7           0.00
   321 H Anderson (SC)          15-28     -13    -6           0.00
   328 A Tusculum               14-17      -3    -1          -1.96

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   228 A Young Harris           13-12       1     5    -     -3.51

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   314 H Lincoln Memorial       15-12       3    -1    +      3.78

Coker Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Adams State Coker   Coker
Adelphi Adelphi   Adelphi
Alabama-Huntsville Coker insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Coker
American International Coker   Coker
Anderson (SC) Anderson (SC) Anderson (SC)  
Assumption Assumption   Assumption
Barton Coker Coker  
Belmont Abbey Belmont Abbey insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 4- 1) Belmont Abbey
Bentley Bentley   Bentley
Bridgeport Bridgeport   Bridgeport
Caldwell Coker   Coker
Catawba Catawba insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) Catawba
Chestnut Hill Chestnut Hill   Chestnut Hill
Chowan Coker Coker  
Colorado Mesa Colorado Mesa   Colorado Mesa
Concordia-Irvine Concordia-Irvine   Concordia-Irvine
D'Youville Coker   Coker
Davenport Davenport   Davenport
Davis & Elkins Coker insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Coker
District of Columbia Coker   Coker
Dominican (CA) Coker   Coker
Dominican (NY) Coker   Coker
Embry-Riddle Embry-Riddle insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) Embry-Riddle
Emmanuel (GA) Coker Coker  
Emory & Henry Coker Coker  
Felician Coker   Coker
Flagler Flagler insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Flagler
Florida Southern Florida Southern tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Florida Southern
Florida Tech Florida Tech insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Florida Tech
Franklin Pierce Coker   Coker
Frostburg State Frostburg State   Frostburg State
Georgian Court Coker   Coker
Holy Family Coker   Coker
Indianapolis Indianapolis insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) Indianapolis
Lake Erie Coker   Coker
Lander Lander Lander  
Lees-McRae Lees-McRae tied - ( 3- 1) ( 3- 1) Lees-McRae
Lenoir-Rhyne Lenoir-Rhyne tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) Lenoir-Rhyne
Lewis Lewis insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Lewis
Limestone Limestone   Limestone
Lincoln Memorial Coker Coker  
Lynn Lynn   Lynn
Malone Coker insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Coker
Mars Hill Coker tied - ( 1- 4) ( 1- 4) Coker
Maryville Maryville   Maryville
Mercy Mercy   Mercy
Molloy Molloy   Molloy
Montevallo Montevallo tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) Montevallo
Mount Olive Coker Coker   5- 1 vs 3- 3
Newberry Newberry Newberry  
North Greenville North Greenville insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) North Greenville
Northwood Northwood   Northwood
Pace Pace   Pace
Palm Beach Atlantic Palm Beach Atlantic insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Palm Beach Atlantic
Post Coker tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Coker
Quincy Coker   Coker
Roberts Wesleyan Coker   Coker
Rockhurst Rockhurst   Rockhurst
Rollins Rollins   Rollins
Seton Hill Seton Hill   Seton Hill
Shorter Coker insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Coker
Southern New Hampshire Southern New Hampshire   Southern New Hampshire
St Anselm St Anselm   St Anselm
St Leo St Leo   St Leo
St Michaels St Michaels   St Michaels
St Thomas Aquinas Coker tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Coker
Tampa Tampa insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) Tampa
Thomas More Coker tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Coker
Tiffin Coker insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Coker
Tusculum Tusculum Tusculum  
Virginia State Coker Coker   2- 2 vs 0- 4
Walsh Walsh   Walsh
Westminster (UT) Westminster (UT)   Westminster (UT)
Wheeling Coker insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Coker
William Jewell Coker tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Coker
Wilmington (DE) Wilmington (DE) tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Wilmington (DE)
Wingate Wingate Wingate  
Young Harris Coker Coker  

PowerWise = 33


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 9.19

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Barton          ( 4- 7, 90.3)    11-10       -9.65      12.90      -0.36         0.84            10.48
   0 A Lander          ( 5- 7, 90.9)    11-13       -9.00      13.55       0.36         0.84            -7.22
   0 H Emmanuel (GA)   ( 2-10, 85.3)    18- 8      -14.64       7.91      -0.36         0.84             6.31
   0 H Chowan          ( 5- 6, 87.0)    15- 8      -12.94       9.61      -0.36         0.84             7.73
   0 H Emory & Henry   ( 0- 8, 80.4)    18- 8      -19.45       3.10      -0.36         0.84             2.29
   0 A Young Harris    ( 1-10, 85.1)    13-12      -14.76       7.80       0.36         0.84             6.82
   0 H Wingate         ( 8- 1, 97.5)     9-21       -2.39      20.16      -0.36         0.84            -2.30
   0 H Lincoln Memori  ( 6- 4, 91.2)    15-12       -8.74      13.81      -0.36         0.84            11.23
   0 A Newberry        ( 9- 2, 96.7)     8-18       -3.24      19.32       0.36         0.84            -2.40
   0 H Anderson (SC)   ( 8- 2, 96.7)    15-28       -3.22      19.33      -0.36         0.84            -2.99
   0 A Tusculum        ( 6- 3, 90.7)    14-17       -9.20      13.35       0.36         0.84            -7.39
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        22.55

winning pts = 44.8535 losing points = -22.3032

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------