Coker
W-L: ( 7- 9) PR = 90.0802Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 201 H Lander PBC ( 9- 7, 93.8) 4-20 208 A Lees-McRae Carolinas ( 3-10, 86.5) 10- 6 215 A Emmanuel (GA) Carolinas ( 8- 7, 88.3) 8-12 223 A Chowan Carolinas ( 1-11, 83.5) 17- 8 226 A Barton Carolinas ( 5-10, 89.5) 11-10 301 H Limestone SAC (15- 2, 99.5) 4-21 308 H Belmont Abbey Carolinas (11- 4, 93.8) 7-12 315 A Lincoln Memorial SAC ( 5- 9, 90.5) 8- 5 319 A Catawba SAC ( 9- 7, 92.3) 3-19 323 H Mars Hill SAC ( 7- 9, 89.4) 14- 9 329 A Anderson (SC) SAC (13- 4, 96.7) 10-25 402 H Newberry SAC (10- 7, 94.5) 4-15 406 H Tusculum SAC ( 5-11, 87.1) 14- 9 411 A Emory & Henry SAC ( 0-14, 77.7) 24- 5 417 H Lenoir-Rhyne SAC (13- 3, 96.8) 9-14 423 A Wingate SAC (14- 4, 96.9) 7-26
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
201 H Lander 4-20 -16 -3 -1.93
208 A Lees-McRae 10- 6 4 3 1.09
215 A Emmanuel (GA) 8-12 -4 1 -- -5.15
223 A Chowan 17- 8 9 6 0.00
226 A Barton 11-10 1 0 1.09
301 H Limestone 4-21 -17 -9 0.00
308 H Belmont Abbey 7-12 -5 -3 -1.96
315 A Lincoln Memorial 8- 5 3 -1 ++ 4.02
319 A Catawba 3-19 -16 -3 - -2.09
323 H Mars Hill 14- 9 5 1 + 3.71
329 A Anderson (SC) 10-25 -15 -7 0.00
402 H Newberry 4-15 -11 -4 -1.26
406 H Tusculum 14- 9 5 4 1.40
411 A Emory & Henry 24- 5 19 12 0.00
417 H Lenoir-Rhyne 9-14 -5 -6 0.00
423 A Wingate 7-26 -19 -7 0.00
|
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 215 A Emmanuel (GA) 8-12 -4 1 -- -5.15 319 A Catawba 3-19 -16 -3 - -2.09 |
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 315 A Lincoln Memorial 8- 5 3 -1 ++ 4.02 323 H Mars Hill 14- 9 5 1 + 3.71 |
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adams State | Coker | Coker | ||
| Adelphi | Adelphi | Adelphi | ||
| Alabama-Huntsville | Alabama-Huntsville | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) | Alabama-Huntsville | |
| American International | Coker | Coker | ||
| Anderson (SC) | Anderson (SC) | Anderson (SC) | ||
| Assumption | Assumption | Assumption | ||
| Barton | Coker | Coker | ||
| Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Bentley | Bentley | Bentley | ||
| Bridgeport | Coker | Coker | ||
| Caldwell | Coker | Coker | ||
| Catawba | Catawba | Catawba | ||
| Chestnut Hill | Coker | Coker | ||
| Chowan | Coker | Coker | ||
| Colorado Mesa | Colorado Mesa | Colorado Mesa | ||
| Concordia-Irvine | Concordia-Irvine | Concordia-Irvine | ||
| D'Youville | Coker | Coker | ||
| Davenport | Coker | Coker | ||
| Davis & Elkins | Coker | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Coker | |
| District of Columbia | Coker | Coker | ||
| Dominican (CA) | Coker | Coker | ||
| Dominican (NY) | Coker | Coker | ||
| Embry-Riddle | Embry-Riddle | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | Embry-Riddle | |
| Emmanuel (GA) | Emmanuel (GA) | Emmanuel (GA) | ||
| Emory & Henry | Coker | Coker | ||
| Felician | Coker | Coker | ||
| Flagler | Flagler | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Flagler | |
| Florida Southern | Florida Southern | tied - ( 0- 3) ( 0- 3) | Florida Southern | |
| Florida Tech | Florida Tech | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Florida Tech | |
| Franklin Pierce | Coker | Coker | ||
| Frostburg State | Frostburg State | Frostburg State | ||
| Georgian Court | Georgian Court | Georgian Court | ||
| Holy Family | Coker | Coker | ||
| Indianapolis | Indianapolis | insuffient: ( 0- 3)( 1- 2) | Indianapolis | |
| Lake Erie | Coker | Coker | ||
| Lander | Lander | Lander | ||
| Lees-McRae | Coker | Coker | ||
| Lenoir-Rhyne | Lenoir-Rhyne | Lenoir-Rhyne | ||
| Lewis | Lewis | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | Lewis | |
| Limestone | Limestone | Limestone | ||
| Lincoln Memorial | Coker | Coker | ||
| Lynn | Lynn | Lynn | ||
| Malone | Coker | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Coker | |
| Mars Hill | Coker | Coker | ||
| Maryville | Maryville | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Maryville | |
| Mercy | Mercy | Mercy | ||
| Molloy | Molloy | Molloy | ||
| Montevallo | Montevallo | insuffient: ( 2- 3)( 3- 2) | Montevallo | |
| Mount Olive | Mount Olive | tied - ( 4- 5) ( 4- 5) | Mount Olive | |
| Newberry | Newberry | Newberry | ||
| North Greenville | North Greenville | North Greenville 8- 0 vs 4- 4 | ||
| Northwood | Coker | Coker | ||
| Pace | Pace | Pace | ||
| Palm Beach Atlantic | Palm Beach Atlantic | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Palm Beach Atlantic | |
| Post | Coker | Coker | ||
| Quincy | Coker | Coker | ||
| Roberts Wesleyan | Coker | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Coker | |
| Rockhurst | Rockhurst | Rockhurst | ||
| Rollins | Rollins | Rollins 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Seton Hill | Seton Hill | Seton Hill | ||
| Shorter | Coker | Coker | ||
| Southern New Hampshire | Southern New Hampshire | Southern New Hampshire | ||
| St Anselm | St Anselm | St Anselm | ||
| St Leo | St Leo | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | St Leo | |
| St Michaels | St Michaels | St Michaels | ||
| St Thomas Aquinas | Coker | Coker | ||
| Tampa | Tampa | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Tampa | |
| Thomas More | Coker | Coker 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Tiffin | Coker | Coker | ||
| Tusculum | Coker | Coker | ||
| Virginia State | Coker | Coker 3- 3 vs 1- 5 | ||
| Walsh | Coker | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Coker | |
| Westminster (UT) | Westminster (UT) | Westminster (UT) | ||
| Wheeling | Coker | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Coker | |
| William Jewell | Coker | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Coker | |
| Wilmington (DE) | Wilmington (DE) | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Wilmington (DE) | |
| Wingate | Wingate | Wingate | ||
| Young Harris | Coker | insuffient: ( 6- 5)( 5- 6) | Coker |
division Games Only
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Lander ( 9- 7, 93.8) 4-20 -6.11 18.99 -0.64 0.91 -6.16
0 A Lees-McRae ( 3-10, 86.5) 10- 6 -13.37 11.73 0.64 0.91 11.29
0 A Emmanuel (GA) ( 8- 7, 88.3) 8-12 -11.62 13.48 0.64 0.91 -10.02
0 A Chowan ( 1-11, 83.5) 17- 8 -16.43 8.66 0.64 0.91 8.50
0 A Barton ( 5-10, 89.5) 11-10 -10.38 14.72 0.64 0.91 14.03
0 H Limestone (15- 2, 99.5) 4-21 -0.43 24.67 -0.64 0.91 -0.98
0 H Belmont Abbey (11- 4, 93.8) 7-12 -6.14 18.96 -0.64 0.91 -6.19
0 A Lincoln Memori ( 5- 9, 90.5) 8- 5 -9.45 15.65 0.64 0.91 14.87
0 A Catawba ( 9- 7, 92.3) 3-19 -7.56 17.54 0.64 0.91 -6.31
0 H Mars Hill ( 7- 9, 89.4) 14- 9 -10.46 14.63 -0.64 0.91 12.77
0 A Anderson (SC) (13- 4, 96.7) 10-25 -3.18 21.91 0.64 0.91 -2.32
0 H Newberry (10- 7, 94.5) 4-15 -5.44 19.66 -0.64 0.91 -5.55
0 H Tusculum ( 5-11, 87.1) 14- 9 -12.77 12.32 -0.64 0.91 10.66
0 A Emory & Henry ( 0-14, 77.7) 24- 5 -22.23 2.87 0.64 0.91 3.20
0 H Lenoir-Rhyne (13- 3, 96.8) 9-14 -3.08 22.02 -0.64 0.91 -3.40
0 A Wingate (14- 4, 96.9) 7-26 -3.02 22.08 0.64 0.91 -2.17
------
32.23
|
